BLAISE PASCAL: THOUGHTS



blaise-pascal-with-quote1


Blaise Pascal was a man who suffered terribly his entire life until he died at age 39 from a metastasized stomach cancer. His mother died when he was 3 years old; his father when he was 28.

For those who aren’t familiar with his life, let me point out that he was French, raised by his sisters, educated by his father, and very involved in the religious controversies of his time (1623-1662).  He was an inventor and mathematician of the highest order. His sufferings — his physical ailments and psychological agonies — are legendary.

I won’t burden people with the details of his life — historians and biographers have written many books to help folks understand this tragic man, if anyone is interested. What I want to do is share, in English, some of the clever things he wrote during his short life and provide a link to his books, if anyone is interested in reading further.

Most of the quotations in this essay were first published some years after his death, gleaned from scraps of paper found among his personal belongings. Had they been published during his lifetime, he might have become even more controversial than he actually was. The added stress of additional criticism from contemporaries might have shortened his life even more.

Blaise Pascal had what modern people would call a negative attitude toward groups like the Jesuits and possibly the Catholic Church, which declared five tenets of his Calvinist-style religious order, the Jansenists, heresy when he was 30 years old and still grieving for his lost father. But mostly, he had a negative attitude toward other people and himself, all of whom he considered to be hopelessly wicked.

Sensitive individuals who suffer like Pascal did, it seems to me, find it more natural than others who live easier lives to think that the world is a hostile place populated by selfish and uncaring people in need of a savior.

Pascal is reported to have said, Sickness is the natural state of Christians. He spoke his dying words in a moment of sublime clarity amid a chaos of physical suffering. He whispered helplessly, May God never abandon me.


cycloid pascal
Pascal solved several previously intractable problems associated with cycloids

Below are some samples of Pascal’s thoughts, which I found interesting and a little sad when first I read them many years ago. His ”pensees” seem to be his way of making sense of a world that held no comfortable place for him to lay his head; a world devoid of a mother’s touch to reassure him; a world lacking the medicines and psychological insights he needed to find the peace, freedom from pain, and the joy for living so many of us in the modern world freely pursue.

Blaise Pascal was oppressed by the heightened discernment of a brilliant mind smothered by relentless suffering. His intelligence (contemporaries called him a prodigy) enabled this sensitive man to articulate his suffering through the lens of Christian philosophy, which he adopted as his own.

Here are some of his thoughts:


Myself at twenty is no longer me.

Christian piety destroys the self. Human civility conceals and suppresses it.

It is a bad sign when someone is seen producing outward results as soon as he is converted. 

Sleep, you say, is the image of death; for my part I say that it is rather the image of life.

We are standing on sand; the earth will be dissolved, and we will fall as we look up at the heavens.

Life is nothing but a perpetual illusion; there is nothing but mutual deception and flattery. No one talks about us in our presence as he would in our absence.

Man is nothing but disguise, falsehood and hypocrisy….  He does not want to be told the truth.

Each rung of fortune’s ladder which brings us up in the world takes us further from the truth, because people are more wary of offending those whose friendship is most useful and enmity most dangerous. A prince can be the laughing-stock of Europe and the only one to know nothing about it.

Is it not true that we hate the truth and those who tell it to us, and we want them to be deceived to our advantage, and want to be esteemed by them as other than we actually are?

It is no doubt an evil to be full of faults, but it is a still greater evil to be full of them and unwilling to recognize them, since this entails the further evil of deliberate self-delusion.

The most unreasonable things in the world become the most reasonable because men are so unbalanced. What could be less reasonable than to choose a ruler of a state the eldest son of a queen?

When we have heard only one side, we are always biased in its favor.

To the church: There is no need to be a theologian to see that their only heresy lies in the fact that they oppose you.

It is false zeal to preserve truth at the expense of charity.

Humiliations dispose us to be humble.

It is better not to fast and feel humiliated by it than to fast and be self-satisfied.

God can bring good out of evil, but without God we bring evil out of good.

God will create an inwardly pure Church, to confound…the inward impiety of the proud Pharisees.  …. For, although they are not accepted by God, whom they cannot deceive, they are accepted by men, whom they do deceive.

We all act like God in passing judgments.

Do small things as if they were great, because of the majesty of Christ, who does them in us and lives our life; and great things as if they were small and easy, because of his almighty power.

They do both good works and bad to please the world and show that they are not wholly Christ’s, for they are ashamed to be.

Jesus was abandoned to face the wrath of God alone. Jesus is alone on earth, not merely with no one to feel and share his agony, but with no one even to know of it.

Silence is the worst form of persecution.

No one is allowed to write well anymore.

You brand my slightest deceptions as atrocious, while excusing them in yourselves as the [(way of your church)].

Would God have created the world in order to damn it? Would he ask so much of such feeble people?

Persecution is the clearest sign of piety.

Which is harder, to be born or to rise again? That what has never been should be, or that what has been should be once more?

All faith rests on miracles.

How happy I should be if…someone took pity on my foolishness, and was kind enough to save me from it in spite of myself.

We must make no mistake about ourselves: we are as much automaton as mind.

You would soon have faith if you gave up a life of pleasure.

We never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when we do it out of conscience.

The proper function of power is to protect.

If everyone knew what others said about him, there would not be four friends in the world.

Fear not, provided you are afraid, but if you are not afraid, be fearful.

God hides himself. He has left men to their blindness, from which they can escape only through Jesus Christ.

I marvel at the boldness with which these people presume to speak of God.

It is an appalling thing to feel all one possesses drain away.

Who has more cause to fear hell, someone who does not know whether there is a hell, but is certain to be damned if there is, or someone who is completely convinced that there is a hell, and hopes to be saved if there is?

Truth is so obscure nowadays and untruth so well established that unless we love the truth we shall never recognize it.

“Yet I have left me seven thousand.”  I love these worshippers who are unknown to the world, and even to the prophets.

We never love anyone, only their qualities.

Must one kill to destroy evildoers? That is making two evildoers in place of one.  Overcome evil with good.

We are nothing but lies, duplicity, contradiction, and we hide and disguise ourselves from ourselves.

As I write down my thought it sometimes escapes me, but that reminds me of my weakness, which I am always forgetting….

Man’s sensitivity to little things and insensitivity to the greatest things are marks of a strange disorder.

It is a fearful blindness to lead an evil life while believing in God.


pascal death mask
Pascal’s death mask.

That’s enough for now.

Blaise, I pray you have found the happiness in Heaven that eluded you on Earth.

Blaise Pascal.  Amazon.com

Billy Lee

MICROWAVE COFFEE

Bevy Mae and me are coffee drinkers. Bevy used to drink a dozen cups of fully caffeinated coffee everyday.  By her third cup she could boogie with the best of them.  But that was a long time ago, before we got old. Now she drinks about two cups, and it’s decaffeinated. Me, on the other hand, well, I still imbibe the high-octane stuff.  I love it.


I drink the high-octane stuff.

If your marriage is anything like ours, you probably own one coffee-maker, but you and your spouse drink different brands, flavors or styles of coffee. For us it means we have to store the contents of at least one of our coffee-pots off-site away from the coffee-maker in containers and carafes; perhaps cups or bowls or glasses or whatever is handy. The coffee gets cold.


69050_Coffee Maker.37173901_std
My wife and I have one coffee maker between us. It’s not enough.

Only one of us at a time can store coffee in the coffee-pot. But since we have two microwave-ovens, we don’t really need to keep our coffee hot. We can turn off the coffee-maker after we brew each pot to save energy.  Everyday we reheat our coffees in the microwaves more than once; thanks to having two of them we don’t wait in line.


We have two microwaves. It is one of the very few things which seem to have made a difference in our marriage.
Two microwaves: they can sometimes save a marriage.

Bevy Mae and I have an eclectic collection of coffee mugs gathered together over decades of marriage. I’ve often wondered: how is it that no matter how big the coffee cup or how tiny; how robust the mug or how dainty; how full or empty we fill — or even which microwave we choose — my wife and I almost never set the timer  to reheat our coffee more than once?

We always seem to set the microwave to exactly the right number of minutes and seconds to heat our coffee to exactly the right temperature.


coffee 4
                She got the calculation right.

Think about it. Can there be any doubt that the mathematics required to accurately set the timer must be beyond the capabilities of 99% of the people who set these timers to reheat their coffee everyday?

The size of the cup, its thickness and material; the amount of coffee in the cup — these are important variables that are required to be taken into account when setting the timer. Not only these variables, but there is the subjective calculation: how hot do I want this coffee to be today? Real hot? Tepid? Mildly warm?

There are many tricky variables to track and put into an equation. And, if we are reheating coffee for our significant others, we have to anticipate their calculation of what the best temperature is for their mood and state of mind.


differential equations EngMath_DifferentialEq_Terminology_02
It takes a matrix of differential and difference equations plus a super computer to get microwave coffee right.

It really takes a sophisticated matrix populated with complex differential and difference equations to work out what the results might be under all the possible scenarios. And it might require a government super-computer to crunch the numbers.

Of course, I’ve never done the actual work of creating the matrix —  or the equations. Even if I had, I would have faced the daunting task of isolating all the relevant variables, the tedium of tracking all the units to make sure I ended up with seconds only in the answer, and the exhaustive testing of results to see if they match up with my expectations and experience.

Successful creation and application of a workable calculus might involve a lot of tweaking.


drinking coffee
He didn’t bother with the calculation.

Come to think of it, why would I do that? Guessing seems to work better and it’s a lot faster. But I wonder. Am I really guessing? Or is my brain, somehow, doing the math in some far away place inside my brain, behind the scenes and beyond my conscious scrutiny?

It’s kind of mysterious, being right all the time, about something as complicated as getting the number of minutes and seconds correct when setting the timer to reheat coffee.

And my wife, who knows no math, is as good at the mental calculation as me. Go figure.

Billy Lee

P.S.  Note to readers: On Valentines Day, 2015, Billy Lee bought a second coffee-maker for his wife, Bevy Mae. Why it took Billy Lee so long to solve his coffee-problem is a mystery even skilled mathematicians can’t solve.
The Editorial Board.


microwave coffee math graphic 6
Don’t try these calculations at home. Seriously. This man tried; his face froze — for. two. hours.

SCALE

The visible universe is big. Most scientists believe the invisible universe — the universe no one can see — is really big.

If the Universe shrunk down to where Earth became the size of a period at the end of a sentence, how big would it be?

When I was a kid, questions like this one fascinated me; what harm is there to revisit a few?

About 100 dots the size of the period at the end of this sentence must be strung together to make an inch. We can imagine shrinking Earth to the size of one of these dots, then plugging-in the numbers to calculate the scale of everything else. It turns out that the observable universe shrinks to a diameter of about two light years.

Since a light year is nearly six-trillion miles, the universe is fantastically big. At this reduced scale, the size of the universe remains pretty much incomprehensible.


In this pic, the Sun sits directly behind Saturn, which is backlit by it. Earth is the tiny dot inside the illustrator’s circle to Saturn’s left. Earth is hundreds-of-millions of miles into the page—behind the gas-giant and its rings. Click pic to enlarge in new window.  

When Earth becomes a period (or dot), the Sun shrinks to close to an inch in diameter — or 2/3 the diameter of a ping-pong ball. [regulation ping-pong balls are 1.575″ in diameter] The dot-sized Earth orbits 10 feet away. Neptune, the farthest planet, is smaller than a BB — a tiny ball of methane ice almost one football field distant (97 yards).

The distance light travels in a year shrinks to 120 miles — a speed approaching  ¼  inch-per-second. The distance to Alpha Centauri, the nearest Sun-like star, shrinks to 500 miles. The star Alpha Centauri shrinks to a ball that is only slightly larger than our under-sized ping-pong ball-sized Sun.

Think about two 1″ diameter ping-pong balls separated by 500 miles. Imagine trying to commute between these balls when the top speed is less than  ¼ inch-per-second. Of course, nothing travels at the speed of light. At speeds typical of spacecraft today, it takes 100,000 years to reach Alpha Centauri.

At the scale where Earth is a dot, one might wonder what is the size variation of stars. It turns out that most suns (stars) in the universe range in size from a grapefruit to a pea. 

Of course, outliers exist like Deneb, the blue-white supergiant visible in the Summer Triangle. At 203 times the size of the Sun, it shrinks to 17 feet or so in diameter depending on how accurately anyone cares to scale things. Rare super-giants are larger; some are 75 feet or more in diameter at this scale. But in the Milky Way Galaxy, our undersized ping-pong Sun is one of the larger stars. 

Is there another way to grasp how large the universe is?

The Milky Way Galaxy — the Sun orbits its center in the space between two of its outermost spiral-arms — is 100,000 light-years across. If the Milky Way was reduced to the dimensions of a coin the size of a quarter, the visible universe (the universe that can be seen with telescopes) would collapse into a sphere of space 15 miles in diameter.

In such a reduced sphere of space, large galaxies become the size of Frisbees but outliers like the mammoth IC1101 are the size of truck tires. The smallest galaxies shrivel into mere grains of sand. Distances between galaxies diminish to 100 feet or so but variations are huge because galaxies tend to cluster together to form groups, which are separated from one another by vast distances.

At this scale, astrophysicists say that the presence of galaxies that cannot be seen (because the distances between our Milky Way Galaxy and the farthest-away galaxies recede faster than the speed-of-light) makes the entire universe, visible and beyond, a minimum of 50 miles in diameter. Light, believe it or not, stands still at this scale. No human observer during their lifetime would notice any movement at all of light or any other phenomenon.

Even the faster-than-light expansion of the universe would be unobservable.

According to physicist, Stephen Hawking, it takes a billion years for the universe to expand by 10%.  Five miles (10% of 50) during a period of one billion years is 7 billionths-of-an-inch per day. During a human lifetime the expansion adds to 2 thousandths-of-an-inch (.002″) — less than half the width of a strand of hair.

At the scale where the Milky Way Galaxy is the size of a quarter, the entire universe would appear to be frozen solid during the span of a human lifetime.


molecules 3
Artist’s view of water molecules. Molecules are the smallest structures that can be directly observed (with the help of special sensing instruments and computer generated enhancements). Molecules are the building blocks of all things.

What about tiny things?

To examine the scale of the very small we can imagine enlarging molecules, the building blocks of all things, to the size of the same period-sized dots.

How tall might an average person be? After again plugging in the numbers and calculating, it turns out that a human stretches to a height of 1,000 miles. The eye expands to an orb 15 miles across.

Molecules are small. But at this imagined scale — a scale that requires  sophisticated instruments to discern — individual molecules become visible. They grow to look like little dots separated by distances only a bit larger than the dots themselves. Sadly, no one can see the individual atoms that make up the molecules. Even at this enlarged scale, they are too small.

No instruments or microscopes can be constructed to enable anyone to “see” atoms. Physicists believe atoms are real because they see the evidence left behind as their debris moves through the detection mediums of cyclotrons, colliders, and other sensors.

Since 1981 physicists have used scanning tunneling microscopes (STMs) to “feel” the forces of atoms with “nano” probes. A computer algorithm plots the forces and creates pictures of atoms, which with this method look like stacked billiard balls.

Billiard balls is not what quantum objects “look” like because quantum objects can’t be seen using human vision but at least scientists can prove that lumps of energy exist and are arranged in patterns that can be analyzed. It’s a start. It’s something.

Models of atoms studied in science class at universities around the world are contrived to help make sense of the results of many experiments. They are somewhat fanciful. 

As for living cells — the basic building blocks of all biology — people are able to observe them under magnification because every cell is built-up from many billions of molecules. Some human cells have trillions. The size of a typical cell at the scale where molecules are expanded to about the size of three-dimensional dots is about 60 feet across.


scale fabric of universe
Artist’s large scale view of the universe.

The gulf between the very large and the very small strains credulity but science says it’s real. When thinking about it, I am overcome by wonder and despair of not knowing why or how.

Theoretical physicist Nima Arkani-Hamed has said that the gulf between the very large and the very small is required to balance the force of gravity against electrical forces in celestial objects like planets. He has pointed out that the ratio of the surface area of a typical atom and the surface area of a typical planet mirrors the difference between the two forces.


Nima Arkani-Hamed, one of the world’s top theoretical physicists, makes a point.

The huge difference between the force of gravity and the force of electricity makes the gap between the very large and the very small essential in a universe that works like ours; the difference in scale is necessary and inevitable, Nima has said. 

If the ratio moves too far from this balance — if the surface area of an object gets too big — gravity will overwhelm the electrical forces that hold the atoms apart to cause the object to light up from a process called fusion, which can leave behind a shining star. A much larger object will collapse to become a black hole

Why is the gap between the force of gravity and the electrical force as vast as the difference in surface area between a typical planet and a hydrogen atom? How did the ratio get that way?

No one knows. The values of the forces seem as finely tuned as they are arbitrary. Nima Arkani-Hamed and others are working to understand why. 

Another mystery: Why is the universe so big?

Even Nima Arkani-Hamed admits he doesn’t have the answer — not yet, anyway. Perhaps the answer lies in the geometry of spheres, which is the basis of the Billy Lee Conjecture discussed in the essay Conscious Life.



Speaking of spheres, everyone knows that billiard balls are polished smooth, right?  Earth, after being shrunk to the size of a pool ball, is smoother and less blemished; more perfectly round. Exhale on a pool-ball to create a mist that is 10 times deeper at scale than the deepest ocean on Earth.

Do the math.

It’s true.

As a child my nightmare was of an enormous whale crushing a tiny flower. A psychologist told me that the whale was a parent; I was the flower. 

Maybe.

But the universe captures my nightmare. It’s really big, and I am so very small — helpless, lost, and crushed within its vast expanse. 

Billy Lee